🔗 Share this article

Well. On one hand, Australia's protracted campaign to host the UN climate conference next year has concluded unsuccessfully.

It campaigned for over 36 months for the privilege to put on the world's biggest environmental conference and green trade fair, which would have attracted many thousands of people to the city of Adelaide next fall.

This won't occur. Instead, the summit known as the UN climate meeting is moving to the tourist destination of the Turkish coastal city, on the Mediterranean coast of Turkey.

Letdown and Conflicting Signals

This outcome will be a significant disappointment to numerous individuals who had believed organizing the climate carnival could help accelerate the country's shift from being a carbon-based economy to a clean energy leader, and bring international focus to the existential plight facing island countries in the Pacific, who would have been co-hosts.

The procedure that resulted in defeat has been an unclear situation. In recent days, there have been doubts that the prime minister and other senior figures truly desired the bid to succeed. His statements sent mixed messages at best. This led to reports in the Australian and international media saying the government was withdrawing.

This contrasted with the message being relayed at the Cop30 talks in the city of Belem, where the environment minister, the climate minister, had just declared the country was "fully committed to success".

Ambiguous backing is not a new issue for the hosting proposal. Although the minister supported it, other high-level figures of the government have only occasionally appeared to care.

DFAT, traditionally responsible for international climate negotiations, has been disengaged and sometimes outright opposed.

There is little sign Albanese has viewed international climate meetings a priority. He hasn't attended one since taking office in 2022. It's uncertain, but some will wonder if additional efforts were possible to secure the hosting rights.

A Different Perspective

That's one interpretation. But there is another way to consider it.

Considering the climate discussions this week in South America – and from an international perspective – the decision on this week may, ironically, have been the most favorable outcome possible.

The minister outlined on that day an unprecedented deal that he was developing with his Turkish counterpart, Murat Kurum. Turkey would be the Cop president, organizer and primary coordinator, and the Australian delegation – the climate minister – would assume a role as "president of negotiations", managing nearly 200 countries on the stuff that the countries actually attend for – the discussions on how to together address the climate crisis.

Additionally, there would be a greater focus on the Pacific region, including a preliminary meeting on an island nation.

Grounds for Scepticism

Multiple reasons exist for doubt. The two nations do not have a close relationship. Specific aspects of the agreement had not been finalized at the moment of announcement. The whole thing could collapse before it gets started.

But it could also be a way to recover value from what appeared to be an approaching car crash for the multilateral work on climate change.

Turkey is widely seen in the international community as having been determined on causing havoc in the international climate negotiations. The system is supposed to work by consensus. Usually, that means if there are several nations in the competition those with weaker backing either withdraw gracefully, or a compromise is quietly done to persuade them to step aside.

The Turkish bid clearly had less support than Australia and Pacific islands to host Cop31. Approximately 24 of the 28 countries responsible for selecting next year's venue had supported the southern pitch.

But, uniquely, Turkey declined to withdraw. The word "bastardry" has been thrown around in recent days, and not only by local commentators.

International Dynamics

Turkey's obstinacy can be read as a reflection of the fracturing geopolitical climate. With the US absent under Donald Trump, there has been no dominant nation with the heft to confront the petroleum exporters that provided the Turks with some cover.

President Erdoğan is considered aligned with the Russian leader. Some countries worried about a conference obstructed from the top if his government led the negotiations. Germany did not want to have to organize an unprepared climate conference at the UN environmental office in the German city, which is what would have happened under UN rules if the deadlock wasn't resolved.

An Innovative Approach

A path through was necessary. The UN system is imperfect and often disconcerting to watch, but global cooperation has empirically made a difference in the fight against global heating. This joint approach is a innovative solution that maintains progress when it is most crucial.

Despite reasonable concerns of the Australian government over its hypocritical support for increasing fossil fuel exports, environmental advocates who participate in UN conferences see Bowen as a positive influence in the talks. He has been requested to co-chair discussion groups at multiple summits he has attended.

This matters. Although some have dismissed the importance of a "chief negotiator", specialists from academic institutions and veteran observers at environmental negotiations say it is crucial to their success.

"Each effective summit has been shaped by a president directing proceedings who can listen, build consensus and achieve an significant result. We saw that in the German capital in 1995, in Cancún in 2010 and the French capital in 2015. We saw the opposite in the Danish city in 2009," he says. "It's the most important role at the conference except for making sure that delegates are fed."

Remaining Concerns

Multiple unresolved issues. For example, civil society plays a vital role at environmental summits. What, if at all, can the federal administration do to stop a restriction on NGO participation by the Turkish leadership?

Possibly little. But that doesn't stop this arrangement looking like the most promising opportunity possible to have a summit that may provide benefits for the Pacific region, Australia and the global community. This attempt is justified.