🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."